Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Posts Tagged ‘I will not Notarise a “Claim of Right”’
Claim of Right
Tuesday, July 21st, 2009
Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right
Many Notaries have recently been contacted by persons wishing to prepare a Notarised Document headed “Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right”. They explain that they wish to claim the status of “Freeman on the Land”. You can find any number of websites dealing with these concepts if you enter either phrase into a search engine.
Please note, I will not assist with these documents.
1. Whether or not there is any validity to these documents – and my belief is that there is none – there is nothing about them which will be validated by the addition of a Notary’s Seal.
2. To the extent that these documents are entered into by people with the intent of decoupling themselves from the tax and legal system of the countries they live in they are doomed to failure and as a Notary I will not be party to the production of pointless documents
3. Also, as a Notary I have sworn an Oath of Allegiance to the Crown. The documents may well be not only pointless but actually unlawful. I repeat, I will not assist with them
4. One should in any event be careful about what one wishes for. It may seem superficially attractive to be a “Freeman on the Land” – self supporting, free from petty restrictions in parking or speeding or paying tax. Rather less so, I suggest, to be excluded from the benefits of the National Health or Education or Emergency Services. In the Middle Ages, no person would wish to claim himself to be an “Outlaw”. It was an effective sentence of death meaning literally to be outside the protection of the law. I do not think that this meaning has essentially changed; it is the Law that holds our human societies together and to place oneself outside the Law is to take a very dangerous step.
This craze appears to have begun in Canada. Now we have a clear and self evidently
sensible Canadian Court judgment which will perhaps help to bring this nonsense to an end
https://www.albertacourts.ab.ca/jdb/2003 … ca0201.pdf
@ freeman steve i believe that if you send in a notice of understanding and intent
and within the stated time period on that notice of understanding and intent
(mine is 14 days) if they dont reply with corrections to ur understanding
within the stated time period via registered mail then the questions
on that notice of understanding and intent become facts and then
u dont need them 2 understand it since then you will be a
freeman on the land and responsible for handling your own affairs
(this includes your rights)
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Mon, 09/01/2008 – 19:19 — Arthur Cristian
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding Australia is a common law jurisdiction, and,
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Australia is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a Tax File Number are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s TFN, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in Australia have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I, _________________________________________ am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach
the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that City Rail is in fact and actuality public property to which I have the right of use and access, and,
Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Tax File Number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppal by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, ___________________ a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter.
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the CRIMINAL CODE – SECT 22.
Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Furthermore, I claim that the courts in New South Wales Australia are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.
Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarised consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppal by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land ______________________________
Place of claim of right: New South Wales, Australia
Notary Public: ____________________________
Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.